top of page

NQ Snap Strategy

Plug and fly

DEVELOPED BY

MICHAŁ ZAREMBA

average rating is 4.7 out of 5

High win-rate, low exposure, free capital — NQ Snap plays smart and pulls ahead of the benchmark.

Inspirations


Quick setups in the stocks of major indices are similar to a spring: the more you compress it, the more dynamically it rebounds. NQ Snap targets these moments, capturing short-term extremes in the right environment. The signal is intended to be rare but high-quality, with precise entry points to minimize slippage. This strategy is designed as a "plug & play" addition to a system portfolio, emphasizing simplicity and repeatability.


Key Components


  • Trend direction filter (long horizon).

  • Short-term impulse/weakness as a tactical trigger.

  • Limit entry to control the opening price.

  • Exits based on market strength rule (but the exit signal is different from most reversal strategies).

  • SL and PT at levels distinguishing the characteristics of this strategy.

Backtest 1 – Fixed $ Money Management

 

In this version, we assess the stability of the parameters and the strategy's performance using a fixed investment amount. Each test consistently involved an investment of $100,000 USD.

 

Parameters:

  • Initial investment capital: USD 100 000

  • Tested years 30

  • Date range: 1995–28.10.2025

  • Tested instrument: Nasdaq 100 (current and historical stocks from the Nasdaq 100 index)

Illustration 1: Capital curve of the strategy from 2015 to October 2025 and the corresponding maximum open drawdowns in $. Open Equity is the red line.
Illustration 1: Capital curve of the strategy from 2015 to October 2025 and the corresponding maximum open drawdowns in $. Open Equity is the red line.
Illustration 2: Basic statistics and results of the NQ Snap strategy, month by month (by closed trades).
Illustration 2: Basic statistics and results of the NQ Snap strategy, month by month (by closed trades).
Illustration 3: Strategy efficiency in $ month by month (by closed trades).
Illustration 3: Strategy efficiency in $ month by month (by closed trades).
ree
Illustration 4: Graphical representation of the strategy's profit and loss distribution, including monthly, daily, and weekly results, plus transaction statistics and effectiveness by close time.
Illustration 4: Graphical representation of the strategy's profit and loss distribution, including monthly, daily, and weekly results, plus transaction statistics and effectiveness by close time.

Backtest 2 – % Money Management


In this variant, 100% of the current capital was used in the strategy, meaning the position value changed proportionally to the account balance. Here are the results:


Illustration 5: Strategy performance table compared to benchmark.
Illustration 5: Strategy performance table compared to benchmark.

The equity chart for this test looks as follows. The chart includes a benchmark—a faint yellow line at the bottom.


Illustration 6: Comparison of capital curves for strategy and benchmark by MM%. Yellow lines represent the benchmark.
Illustration 6: Comparison of capital curves for strategy and benchmark by MM%. Yellow lines represent the benchmark.
Illustration 7: Basic statistics of the strategy with percentage capital management.
Illustration 7: Basic statistics of the strategy with percentage capital management.
Illustration 8: Monthly strategy results as percentages compared to the benchmark (open daily equity is used).
Illustration 8: Monthly strategy results as percentages compared to the benchmark (open daily equity is used).

Trading Strategy Analysis


Net Profit and CAGR


The strategy achieved nearly three times the profit of the benchmark and a higher annual return rate (CAGR). The advantage was maintained throughout the entire test period.


Drawdown and Return/Open Drawdown Ratio


The capital drawdown was significantly lower than the benchmark, resulting in a clearly better Return/Open Drawdown ratio—the profit-to-risk relationship remained favorable even during more challenging market phases.


Exposure


The strategy's average exposure was only 16.6%, leaving substantial "portfolio capacity" for integrating NQ Snap with other uncorrelated systems.


Illustration 9: Max and average daily exposure $ and percentiles (generated with AlgoHubb’s Exposure Master).
Illustration 9: Max and average daily exposure $ and percentiles (generated with AlgoHubb’s Exposure Master).

Winning Percent


A hit rate of 72.6% demonstrates the selectivity of the signals and the consistency of the position selection process.


SL & TP


The strategy uses both Stop Loss and Take Profit.


Market Regime


The system was tested across diverse market regimes; filtering mechanisms support signal selection based on the prevailing market conditions. You can find more about market regimes here.


Trading Costs


The tests accounted for transaction costs and slippage, utilizing data from the broker Alpaca. You can explore our latest research on transaction costs with Alpaca here. With a diversified stock portfolio and strategy, transaction costs can significantly affect your profits or losses. Therefore, it's crucial to thoroughly test and select a broker.


Robustness


The strategy has passed the parameter modification tests. The principle of minimizing the number of parameters was adopted to enhance the strategy's robustness. The criteria for selecting parameters included their significant impact on effectiveness and alignment with the strategy's nature.

 

Additionally, we conducted stress tests covering all possible transactions based on historical data for the S&P 500 and S&P 100 indices.

 

S&P500

  • Max open positions: 100

  • Tested years: 30

  • Number of trades tested: 13810

Illustration 10: Backtest results of the strategy on the S&P500.
Illustration 10: Backtest results of the strategy on the S&P500.

S&P 100

  • Max open positions: 50

  • Tested years: 30

  • Number of trades tested: 3223

Illustration 11: Backtest results of the strategy on the S&P 100.
Illustration 11: Backtest results of the strategy on the S&P 100.

In both tests, the strategy remains very similar, achieving excellent results.


Recommended Instruments

  • Primary instrument: NASDAQ 100

  • Others: S&P 500, S&P 100

 

Pattern Day Trader


Attention! In the study used by PDT Finder, over a 30-year backtest, the strategy had only 20 instances in which a position was opened and closed on the same day.

 

However, practice shows that achieving Profit Target within one day occurs more frequently than in backtesting, and this is related to the strategy specifics and the natural limitations of backtesting described here (https://strategyquant.com/doc/strategyquant/sp-backtest-limitations/#SLPT).

 

Based on our experience, a sequence of 4 such transactions across five consecutive sessions has not occurred, so the strategy on its own should not trigger PDT.

 

Practical note: In a portfolio with other systems, the total activity may already meet the PDT requirements — it's worth keeping this in mind and also checking your whole portfolio using the PDF Finder.


Correlation


Checking correlation helps avoid duplicating risk in a portfolio and better combine systems with different profiles. You can find more about correlation here.

 

Strengths of the Strategy

 

  • A very low average exposure (16.5%) yields an impressive Exposure-Adjusted Return of over 83%, making the strategy suitable for integration into a portfolio alongside other systems.

  • A high percentage of profitable transactions (72%) confirms the quality of the signals.

  • A reasonable maximum drawdown of around 20%.

  • Several components of this strategy are less frequently used in our strategies, providing a unique profile that adds value to the portfolio.

Weaknesses of the Strategy


  • There are fewer signals when the market is "standing still" or rising quickly. The strategy targets quick extremes, so if the market lacks dynamism, signals will be limited.

  • The backtest limitations outlined in the PDT section do not account for some profitable trades that are closed on the same day they are opened.


Summary


NQ Snap is a strategy I personally love. It is designed to capitalize on fear, and exits when the market regains strength. In tests, it outperforms a benchmark while maintaining much lower drawdowns. It operates infrequently but with precision, meaning capital is engaged only for a small portion of the time on average. This makes it easier to integrate with other systems in a portfolio. If you're seeking an approach that combines reasonable risk with a predictable process and simple rules, NQ Snap meets these criteria.

 

 



What you get in the package for this strategy:

 

  • An eBook describing detailed rules and results of the strategy.

  • The SQX file is ready to use on the Algocloud and StrategyQuant platforms.

  • Pseudocode that describes all the rules in an easy-to-understand way.

Disclaimer

 

The results obtained from historical data do not guarantee future outcomes. The effectiveness of a strategy can change over time. Backtesting is a tool that allows for the analysis and evaluation of an investment strategy based on historical data. Various factors, such as market changes or economic conditions, can influence the effectiveness of a strategy over time.

Investing always involves risk. This material is not investment advice. We share our experience and algorithms for educational purposes. We make efforts to ensure that our algorithms are error-free, but neither we nor the tools we use guarantee the absence of technical issues. Any decisions to use a particular strategy are made at your own risk and should be preceded by careful understanding and verification. You should always carefully consider your investment goals and risk tolerance before making investment decisions.

BEST STRATEGIES

average rating is 4.7 out of 5

NQ Snap Strategy

High win-rate, low exposure, free capital — NQ Snap plays smart and pulls ahead of the benchmark.

average rating is 4.7 out of 5

Volta Strategy

The Volta strategy uses a volume-based indicator as its foundation, which distinguishes the strategy profile from most typical reversal strategies. It is a mean reversion strategy that waits for a quick pullback in an uptrend.

average rating is 4.6 out of 5

Triple B Strategy

The Triple B strategy combines three indicators that support each other. The basis of the strategy is the %B indicator based on Bollinger Bands.

average rating is 4.6 out of 5

Stock Monthly Mover Strategy

The strategy is based on a monthly pattern that has been occurring in stocks for several decades. A great advantage of it is the low capital commitment (on average around 13% of real exposure), which allows for simultaneous use of capital in other strategies.

average rating is 4.6 out of 5

Bollinger Bounce Strategy

The strategy effectively identifies overreactions and the subsequent snapbacks, outperforming a buy-and-hold in the long term while maintaining an average exposure of only 8%.

average rating is 4.5 out of 5

R2 Turbo Strategy

The R2 Turbo strategy is inspired by Larry Connors' experiences. It uses the Relative Strength Index (RSI) indicator in a unique way, along with filters to boost its effectiveness. This trend reversal strategy waits for a specific pullback during an uptrend.

average rating is 4.5 out of 5

Week Explorer Strategy

For last 40 years, the best day of the week on the US stock market has been Tuesday. The next day with the highest return is Wednesday. We present a strategy that skillfully exploits this market behavior by opening positions only on Mondays and cashing in profits in almost 70% of cases over the following days.

average rating is 4.4 out of 5

IBS Master Strategy

IBS Master draws inspiration from the experiences of Linda Raschke described in the book Street Smarts: High Probability Short-Term Trading.

average rating is 4.4 out of 5

RSI Range Rider Strategy

If J. Welles Wilder knew that the indicator he described in 1978 was still performing so well, he would be very proud. It is a matter of matching a powerful indicator to the nature of the instrument, that is US stocks.

average rating is 4.3 out of 5

KO Christmas Rally Strategy

The seasonal holiday pattern on Coca-Cola is one fantastic example of how seasons affect stocks. The pattern has a logical justification, which is the association of the brand with holidays built over decades. This consequently influenced consumer and investor behavior before this period.

average rating is 4.3 out of 5

BBIQ Strategy

The BB IQ strategy utilizes the Momentum effect by purchasing stocks that are in the Exponential Move phase and those that are among the strongest in the index.

average rating is 4.3 out of 5

Momentum IBS 3xETF Strategy

Momentum IBS focuses on three ETFs, rarely engages capital, but is a valuable addition to most portfolios due to the stability of profits and excellent risk-reward ratio. It offers a 71% win rate and a different profile compared to typical reversal strategies.

bottom of page