top of page

BBIQ Strategy

Riding the momentum wave

average rating is 4.3 out of 5

DEVELOPED BY

MICHAŁ ZAREMBA

The BB IQ strategy utilizes the Momentum effect by purchasing stocks that are in the Exponential Move phase and those that are among the strongest in the index.

Inspirations


The BB IQ strategy leverages the widely discussed Momentum effect in the stock market. Unlike a pure trend, it requires a stock to enter the Exponential Move phase and simultaneously be among the TOP fastest-growing companies in a given index.


The strategy buys the strength of such assets when they achieve the momentum effect and follows the position until the trend is exhausted. A strong point of the strategy is the distinct forces it utilizes compared to reversal strategies, making it a valuable component of a well-balanced portfolio.


Key Components


  • Custom settings for Bollinger Bands to identify the Momentum effect

  • Additional filters to exclude opening positions in market conditions unfavorable for the strategy.

  • Stockpicker Mechanism, which searches for and automatically selects stocks meeting the criteria.

Backtest 1, Fixed $ Money Management


In this variant, we consistently invest the same amount of $100k, which is divided by the maximum number of open positions.


We are testing the period of the last 30 years from 1994 to 02.2025.

The backtest automatically selects stocks that meet the criteria from the S&P500 index. Let's remember that the list of stocks included in the index has changed over the years, which is accounted for by the data used in Stockpicker (survivorship bias).


Invested capital: $100k

Tested period in years: 30

Tested years: 1994-02.2025

Tested Index: S&P500

Equity Chart for this test:

Illustration 1: Capital curve of the strategy from 1994 to February 2025 and the corresponding maximum open drawdowns in $
Illustration 1: Capital curve of the strategy from 1994 to February 2025 and the corresponding maximum open drawdowns in $
Illustration 2: Basic statistics and results of the BBIQ strategy month by month
Illustration 2: Basic statistics and results of the BBIQ strategy month by month
Illustration 3: Strategy efficiency in $ month by month based on closed positions
Illustration 3: Strategy efficiency in $ month by month based on closed positions

Summary of statistics - all data according to the closing date of positions.

Illustration 4: General stats based on closed positions and close date
Illustration 4: General stats based on closed positions and close date

Backtest 2, % Money Management


In this backtest, we invest 100% of the current capital in the strategy, starting with an initial capital of $100k. As the capital increases or decreases, the position value changes proportionally. All other parameters remain unchanged.


The Equity Chart for this test and the comparison with the Benchmark are presented below. Open Equity is a red line. Closed equity is a blue area.

Illustration 5: Comparison of capital equity of strategy and benchmark for MM%
Illustration 5: Comparison of capital equity of strategy and benchmark for MM%

Basic statistics resulting from the test:

Illustration 6: Basic statistics of the strategy with percentage capital management
Illustration 6: Basic statistics of the strategy with percentage capital management
Illustration 7: Monthly strategy results as percentages compared to the benchmark (open daily equity is used)
Illustration 7: Monthly strategy results as percentages compared to the benchmark (open daily equity is used)

Additional information about the strategy


Net Profit and CAGR


Net profit exceeding $5.9 million is significantly higher than the benchmark, the S&P 500 Index (ETF SPY marked in yellow on the chart), which stands at $2.1 million. This translates to a CAGR of 14.11% compared to 10.61%. This indicates that the studied strategy demonstrate a strong efficiency in generating long-term profits.


Drawdown and Return/Drawdown Ratio


The Max Open Drawdown in the studied strategy was -27.05%, resulting in a Return/Drawdown ratio of 13.46.


Exposure


The average exposure in the studied strategy was 80% vs 100% in the benchmark. Here's how it looked historically:


Illustration 8: Max and average daily exposure $ and percentiles
Illustration 8: Max and average daily exposure $ and percentiles

As you can see, the average exposure was about 80%. However, during Bull Market periods, the strategy practically always traded at 100%, and during periods unfavorable for the stock market, it reduced positions or remained entirely in cash. This is a logical and correct behavior.


The study was conducted on the underlying instrument, i.e., S&P500 stocks. We measure exposure with a dedicated tool,, which you can read about here.


Winning percent and avg. Win/Loss


The win rate was slightly below 50%, which is a very decent result for this type of strategy.


At the same time, the Avg. Win was nearly 3.5 times greater than the Avg. Loss, which is clearly visible in the MM$ test results. Thus, the strategy profited from both the Winrate and the avg. Win/Loss ratio.


SL


The strategy doesn't use a hard stop loss by default. Protection against a significant price change of a single stock affecting the entire portfolio is provided by the Exit Rule. This rule acts as a Trailing Stop. Additionally, the strategy includes diversification with 20 parallel positions by default. We also recommend diversifying strategies within the strategy portfolio.

Visit the stop loss order page.


Market regime


The strategy was tested in all basic market regimes and includes filters implemented based on this.

Read more about market regimes.


Trading costs


The backtests took into account trading costs and slippage that occurred on a real account in our tests for the broker Alpaca (read more here). With a diversified stock and strategy portfolio, transaction costs can determine your profit or loss, so take the time to thoroughly test and choose a broker.


Robustness


The robustness was examined by conducting a very large number of stock transactions for the period from 1994 to February 2025 for the S&P 500 indices (3,043 transactions with Max Open Positions 100), Russell 1000 (5,473 transactions with Max Open Positions 200), and Nasdaq 100 (660 transactions with Max Open Positions 50). The study was conducted using %MM to capture comparable parameters.


The results are as follows:

Illustration 9: Comparison of S&P 500, Russell 1000, and Nasdaq 100 indices
Illustration 9: Comparison of S&P 500, Russell 1000, and Nasdaq 100 indices

As can be seen, the results at the level of individual indicators are very similar, which indicates the robustness of the strategy across different categories of stocks.


Additionally, this strategy has passed our parameter modifications tests (System Parameter Permutation). The main parameters are in robust areas and can be modified by +/-20% without significantly affecting the strategy.


Illustration 10: The optimization analysis assesses strategy performance using key parameters: median net profit, drawdown, Max DD %, Ret/DD ratio, CAGR, Sharpe Ratio, and frequency distributions
Illustration 10: The optimization analysis assesses strategy performance using key parameters: median net profit, drawdown, Max DD %, Ret/DD ratio, CAGR, Sharpe Ratio, and frequency distributions

We adhere to the principle that the fewer parameters, the greater the robustness of the strategy. Therefore, we strive to ensure that our strategies have as few parameters as possible and to select only those parameters that have a significant impact on the strategy's effectiveness while aligning with its nature.


Recommended Instruments


The recommended primary instrument for this strategy in Algocloud Stockpicker is the S&P 500 companies, but as shown by the above research, the strategy should perform comparably well on other indices. When trading small-cap stocks like those in the Russell index, one should account for greater slippage and potential liquidity constraints (it is recommended to introduce a minimum daily transaction value filter, i.e., price x volume, for this index).


Primary Instrument: S&P 500

Additional Instruments: Stocks from other US indices


Pattern Day Trader


The strategy did not close any transactions on the same day, so it does not meet the Pattern Day Trader (PDT) criteria. This means it can also successfully operate on accounts below $25k.


Correlation


To check the correlation of the strategy with others, go to the page dedicated to correlations.


The strategy shows an inverse correlation to reversal strategies, which is a significant advantage.


This means that:


  • if the market is rising strongly, Reversal strategies have often already taken profits, while BBIQ will keep us in the trend, often outperforming the market.

  • if the market falls sharply in an upward trend, Reversal strategies may incur short term losses, while BBIQ collects long-earned profits from its positions, thus balancing the losses of the former.

Like all strategies of this kind, it is expected to cut losses quickly after implementation. Only in the long term will it start taking profits.



Summary & Strengths and Weaknesses of the strategy



Strengths of the strategy


  • Net profit above $5.8 million, which is significantly higher than the Benchmark (S&P 500 Index), which was $2.2 million, with CAGR 14.11% vs 10.61%. The Max Open Drawdown was 27%, and the Return/Drawdown ratio is 13.46.

  • Avg. Win was simultaneously 3.5x greater than Avg. Loss and Winning percent at 47.0%, which is a quite good result for this type of strategy.

  • Low correlation to reversal strategies: It shows an inverse correlation to reversal strategies, making it a valuable component of a well-balanced portfolio, especially during periods of strong growth impulses.

  • Robustness: The strategy successfully passed parameter modification tests and tests on 3 different indices, indicating its resilience to various categories of stocks and different market behaviors in the future.

Weaknesses of the strategy


  • Long holding period: The average holding period is about 200 days. This means that during bull markets, practically all entrusted capital is engaged here.

  • Different significance in different periods. Momentum strategies can add value in various markets. However, we believe their main role in a portfolio is during the early phase of a Bull Market. In a mature Bull Market, reversal strategies might play a bigger role, while Momentum can help balance the portfolio.


Summary


Momentum is a strong trading concept that has been active in markets for hundreds of years. A trend is more likely to continue than to reverse, and BBIQ effectively captures the strongest trends and follows them until they are exhausted. Despite its simple rules, backtests over the last 30 years show very good results. It offers a different approach compared to reversal strategies, making it an attractive option for investors seeking active capital growth. While its weaknesses should be considered, this strategy can be a valuable part of a balanced investment portfolio.





What you get in the package for this strategy:


  • Ebook describing detailed rules and results of the strategy.

  • SQX file ready to use on the Algocloud and StrategyQuant platforms.

  • Pseudocode that describes all the rules in an easy-to-understand way.

  • Key indicators in a format intended for TradingView (pine script).

  • BONUS - Strategy showing basic signals on the TradingView chart (in pine script format).

Disclaimer

 

The results obtained from historical data do not guarantee future outcomes. The effectiveness of a strategy can change over time. Backtesting is a tool that allows for the analysis and evaluation of an investment strategy based on historical data. Various factors, such as market changes or economic conditions, can influence the effectiveness of a strategy over time.

Investing always involves risk. This material is not investment advice. We share our experience and algorithms for educational purposes. We make efforts to ensure that our algorithms are error-free, but neither we nor the tools we use guarantee the absence of technical issues. Any decisions to use a particular strategy are made at your own risk and should be preceded by careful understanding and verification. You should always carefully consider your investment goals and risk tolerance before making investment decisions.

BEST STRATEGIES

average rating is 4.7 out of 5

Volta Strategy

The Volta strategy uses a volume-based indicator as its foundation, which distinguishes the strategy profile from most typical reversal strategies. It is a mean reversion strategy that waits for a quick pullback in an uptrend.

average rating is 4.6 out of 5

Stock Monthly Mover Strategy

The strategy is based on a monthly pattern that has been occurring in stocks for several decades. A great advantage of it is the low capital commitment (on average around 13% of real exposure), which allows for simultaneous use of capital in other strategies.

average rating is 4.5 out of 5

R2 Turbo Strategy

The R2 Turbo strategy is inspired by Larry Connors' experiences. It uses the Relative Strength Index (RSI) indicator in a unique way, along with filters to boost its effectiveness. This trend reversal strategy waits for a specific pullback during an uptrend.

average rating is 4.5 out of 5

Triple B Strategy

The Triple B strategy combines three indicators that support each other. The basis of the strategy is the %B indicator based on Bollinger Bands.

average rating is 4.5 out of 5

Week Explorer Strategy

For last 40 years, the best day of the week on the US stock market has been Tuesday. The next day with the highest return is Wednesday. We present a strategy that skillfully exploits this market behavior by opening positions only on Mondays and cashing in profits in almost 70% of cases over the following days.

average rating is 4.4 out of 5

IBS Master Strategy

IBS Master draws inspiration from the experiences of Linda Raschke described in the book Street Smarts: High Probability Short-Term Trading.

average rating is 4.4 out of 5

RSI Range Rider Strategy

If J. Welles Wilder knew that the indicator he described in 1978 was still performing so well, he would be very proud. It is a matter of matching a powerful indicator to the nature of the instrument, that is US stocks.

average rating is 4.3 out of 5

KO Christmas Rally Strategy

The seasonal holiday pattern on Coca-Cola is one fantastic example of how seasons affect stocks. The pattern has a logical justification, which is the association of the brand with holidays built over decades. This consequently influenced consumer and investor behavior before this period.

average rating is 4.3 out of 5

BBIQ Strategy

The BB IQ strategy utilizes the Momentum effect by purchasing stocks that are in the Exponential Move phase and those that are among the strongest in the index.

average rating is 4.3 out of 5

Momentum IBS 3xETF Strategy

Momentum IBS focuses on three ETFs, rarely engages capital, but is a valuable addition to most portfolios due to the stability of profits and excellent risk-reward ratio. It offers a 71% win rate and a different profile compared to typical reversal strategies.

average rating is 4.2 out of 5

BKNG Winter Travel Strategy

Winter is one of the two best seasons for Booking.com. This is also true for the company's stock. The winter strategy will show you how holding the stock for just 25 days in January and February could yield results similar to holding the index for the entire year.

average rating is 4.1 out of 5

BA Flight to Growth Strategy

Each year, the shares of the aerospace giant The Boeing Company (BA) statistically see an increase from the end of October to the beginning of January. What might drive this trend? Increased air traffic during the holiday season, which reminds investors of the company? Or perhaps government purchases at the end of the year cause Boeing's shares to gain strength?

bottom of page